Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lansberry, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richards, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lansberry, C. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A National Survey of Graduate Family Nursing Educators

Eleanor Richards, Ph.D., R.N., C.S.

Mercy College

Carolyn R. Lansberry, Ph.D., R.N., C.S.

Mercy College

A descriptive study was undertaken to explore the philosophical and educational beliefs of graduate faculty teaching advanced nursing with families. Data from 177 faculty representing 107 graduate nursing programs accredited by the National LeagueforNursingwere used in the analyses. Descriptive data were gathered on program and faculty demographics, conceptual frameworks that faculty identified as influencing their teaching offamily content, and faculty beliefs about concepts central to family nursing. A Family Nursing Belief Inventory (FNBI) was developed to elicit faculty beliefs. The FNBI consisted of 14 item pairs of dichotomous statements reflecting divergent nursing paradigm (totality and simultaneity) beliefs about thefamily. Results show thatfaculty clearly preferred statements that reflect the beliefs of the simultaneity worldview, whereas most nursing models that influenced their teaching reflect the beliefs of the totality worldview. Less than 1% of respondents taught a corefamily course in graduate programs and the majority offaculty usedfamily rather than nursing frameworks. Seventy-nine percent offaculty reported that a diagnostic taxonomy is not essential in family nursing practice. Continuing dialogue between nursing theorists and educators is necessary.

Journal of Family Nursing, Vol. 1, No. 4, 382-396 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/107484079500100403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
K. A. Flowers, W. S. John, and J. M. Bell
The Role of the Clinical Laboratory in Teaching and Learning Family Nursing Skills
Journal of Family Nursing, May 1, 2008; 14(2): 242 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
K. LeGrow and B. E. Rossen
Development of Professional Practice Based on a Family Systems Nursing Framework: Nurses' and Families' Experiences
Journal of Family Nursing, February 1, 2005; 11(1): 38 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
S. L. Baumann
Family Nursing: Theory-Anemic, Nursing Theory-Deprived
Nurs Sci Q, October 1, 2000; 13(4): 285 - 290.
[PDF]